Back to all
Nominal Features

Intercompany Eliminations: Why It’s Time to Automate the Most Manual Step in Consolidation

Veronika Matiushenk, Nominal's Finance Automation and AI Consultant
Veronika Matiushenko
Jul 30, 2025

Intercompany eliminations remove internal transactions between related entities in a corporate group, ensuring consolidated financial statements reflect only external activity. They prevent double-counting of revenue and expenses, improve reporting accuracy, and support compliance with accounting standards such as GAAP and IFRS.

Intercompany eliminations may not make headlines, but they sit at the center of one of the most critical processes in finance: multi-entity consolidation

These adjustments are essential for producing accurate financial statements, yet they often remain a slow, manual, and error-prone task for finance teams.

Controllers and CFOs at global or rapidly scaling companies know the pain all too well. Reconciling internal transactions in spreadsheets, wrangling data from multiple ERPs, managing timing and currency differences all add friction and risk to the close. 

Teams either throw more headcount at the problem or delay monthly eliminations until year-end, creating compliance headaches and operational blind spots.

The problem is not just inefficiency. It is strategic misalignment. When finance is buried in cleanup work, they cannot focus on delivering insight or supporting growth. Automation is no longer a nice-to-have in the close process. It is a requirement.

In this post, we will break down why consolidation eliminations are so complex, how traditional methods fall short, and what a modern, AI-native approach looks like in practice. Let’s get into it.

What Are Intercompany Eliminations?

Intercompany eliminations are the accounting adjustments used to remove transactions between entities under the same corporate group during the consolidation process. 

These entries ensure the consolidated financial statements reflect only transactions with external parties, presenting a true picture of the group’s financial position.

For example, if Subsidiary A sells goods to Subsidiary B for $100, both entities might record that amount as revenue and expense, respectively. 

Without elimination, the consolidated revenue would be overstated by $100. By removing this internal transaction, finance teams prevent double-counting and produce accurate, compliant reports.

These eliminations can include:

  • Sales and purchases between subsidiaries
  • Intercompany loans or transfers
  • Management fees and royalty charges
  • Cost allocations

While the concept is straightforward, execution is not. The more entities, currencies, and ERP systems involved, the more time-consuming and risky the process becomes. What starts as a routine accounting adjustment can easily become a bottleneck for the entire finance function.

Why Manual Intercompany Eliminations Are a Bottleneck

Many finance teams still rely heavily on spreadsheets for consolidation eliminations, which leads to a range of operational and strategic challenges.

Slow and Error-Prone Processes

Manual entries increase the risk of inconsistency and misalignment across entities, especially when transaction data is stored in disconnected systems. Even a minor mismatch in timing, currency rate, or GL account can derail the process.

Extended Close Cycles

Reconciliation delays often compound during period-end, especially when eliminations are deferred until year-end due to the complexity of the task. The result is a bloated close process that eats into finance teams' capacity for analysis and insight.

Audit Risk and Compliance Gaps

Without a reliable system of record or audit trail, it becomes difficult to justify eliminations or investigate discrepancies. Auditors are increasingly scrutinizing entity-to-entity transactions for accuracy, completeness, and consistency.

Scalability Issues

As organizations grow in complexity and geographic footprint, the manual approach becomes unsustainable. Global teams must manage multiple ERPs, currency conversions, and local reporting standards, often without a unified workflow or ownership model.

Lack of Real-Time Visibility

Without continuous data syncing or standardized logic, there’s no way to know the current state of eliminations. Finance leaders are left waiting for Excel files or Slack messages to confirm progress, which delays insights and decisions.

Automating Intercompany Eliminations with Nominal

Nominal replaces spreadsheet-bound workflows with intelligent automation, helping finance teams consolidate faster, more accurately, and with less overhead.

Centralize and Normalize Multi-ERP Data

Nominal unifies financial data across disparate systems, whether you're running QuickBooks Online, NetSuite, Sage, or even uploading trial balances from standalone ledgers. 

The platform syncs all subsidiary and parent company data, preserving full dimensionality such as entity, department, and currency.

This consolidation-ready data architecture eliminates the need for manual exports and cleanup, setting the foundation for automated eliminations. Finance teams can integrate once and scale continuously, regardless of how many systems they add.

Rule-Based Mapping with Full Flexibility

At the core of Nominal’s elimination engine is its rule set framework. These rules map each subsidiary’s chart of accounts to the parent account structure using logic that aligns with the company’s internal definitions. Mapping can be based on:

  • Account name or type
  • Code ranges
  • Custom labels or dimensions

Unlike hard-coded ERP logic or expensive custom integrations, Nominal puts the configuration in your hands. Mapping rules are flexible, version-controlled, and reusable. And when accounts fall outside a rule, it notifies users instantly so they can resolve mismatches before they slow down the close.

Finance teams no longer need to patch together mapping logic in Excel or pay for custom logic in legacy platforms. They can establish repeatable processes that scale with complexity.

You might also like: How Finance Teams Use Trigger Agents

Real-Time Eliminations, Not After-the-Fact

Because data is continuously refreshed and exchange rates are updated live, Nominal enables ongoing eliminations rather than post-close reconciliations. Journal entries are generated automatically and updated as needed, so finance teams can run accurate, in-progress reports at any time.

Instead of delaying entity-to-entity eliminations until year-end, teams can now perform them monthly or even weekly without incurring significant time or resource costs. This shift changes the role of finance from record-keeping to real-time oversight.

For multinational companies managing multiple currencies and reporting standards, this cadence unlocks new levels of agility. 

Eliminations can be viewed in the context of US GAAP, IFRS, or local statutory requirements without duplicating work or reformatting reports.

Built-In Governance and Auditability

Every elimination entry in Nominal is tracked, traceable, and tied to its original transaction source. The platform maintains a complete audit trail of all mappings, rules, and adjustments. Versioning controls and role-based permissions ensure proper oversight and compliance readiness.

This governance model reduces audit prep time and increases confidence in the integrity of consolidated financials. For companies preparing for IPO, undergoing due diligence, or expanding internationally, these controls are not just convenient: they are essential.

Nominal also provides visibility into who approved what and when, creating defensible documentation that meets the expectations of external auditors, regulators, and internal risk committees.

Real Use Cases: Where Intercompany Eliminations Go Wrong

Here are a few common scenarios where manual elimination workflows break down:

Multi-Currency Operations

Teams using average exchange rates in spreadsheets often misstate balances. Using live FX rates ensures accuracy across borders. This avoids translation errors that distort profit margins and confuse leadership.

Year-End Consolidation Only

Many teams postpone eliminations because they are too painful to repeat monthly. This creates large one-time adjustments that are harder to justify and audit. Automating the process makes monthly consolidation not only feasible but standard.

Inflexible Legacy Tools

Some ERP modules offer basic elimination logic but lack the flexibility to reflect company-specific rules or multi-ERP structures. Nominal is built for this complexity. It does not require migration or heavy IT intervention.

Unclear Ownership and Timelines

Manual processes make it difficult to assign accountability or track deadlines. A purpose-built workflow engine helps teams align around shared timelines and expectations.

Missed Materiality Thresholds

In high-volume environments, even small variances can add up. With real-time exception reporting and variance analysis, material discrepancies are flagged as they occur, reducing financial statement risk.

Why Nominal Is Different

Nominal is not an add-on or patchwork integration. It is a finance-native automation platform designed to handle intercompany eliminations, consolidation, and reporting across any system or entity structure.

What you gain with purpose-built automation:

  • A single source of truth across all entities and ERPs
  • Configurable logic for mapping and eliminations
  • Resilience when team members are unavailable
  • The ability to replicate and scale your close process
  • Audit-ready transparency and traceability
  • Real-time visibility into close status and elimination progress

It delivers faster close times, lower risk, and more insight without adding headcount or replacing your ERP. Finance teams can finally shift their focus from fixing data to driving strategy.

Intercompany eliminations are foundational to accurate consolidation, yet they remain a major challenge for finance teams dealing with multi-entity structures, disconnected systems, and increasing regulatory scrutiny. 

Manual approaches fall short in speed, scale, and reliability. Automation offers a way forward, enabling finance leaders to streamline processes, strengthen compliance, and focus on what matters: insight and strategy.

Whether your organization is preparing for international expansion, accelerating M&A, or simply trying to reduce close fatigue, eliminating the manual burden is a critical step. The right tools give you confidence not just in your numbers, but in your ability to scale.

Ready to eliminate the manual burden of consolidation? Book a demo to see how Nominal automates intercompany eliminations and accelerates your close.

Struggling with never-ending close cycles and spreadsheet chaos? Discover how AI-powered financial consolidation can eliminate manual work, reduce risk, and finally make “done” mean done. Download the white paper to see how leading finance teams are transforming close without ERP migration.

Sign up
for updates

About the writer

Veronika Matiushenk, Nominal's Finance Automation and AI Consultant
Veronika Matiushenko
Veronika Matiushenko

Veronika Matiushenko is a Finance Automation and AI Consultant at Nominal, specializing in company growth and operational automation. With 5+ years of multi-industry experience, she helps finance teams streamline consolidation, reconciliation, and reporting with AI-driven solutions. As an experienced AI user, Veronika actively leverages AI technologies to drive business growth and optimize automation strategies.

Table of contents
Related Blogs by the Author

Continue reading

Join the Smartest in Finance.
Move Beyond Spreadsheets.